System Designer
Back to Reference

SQL vs NoSQL

Database selection matrix and performance benchmarks

Not Started
Loading...

The SQL vs NoSQL decision isn't about which is better—it's about choosing the right tool for your specific needs. SQL databases excel at complex queries, ACID transactions, and data integrity. NoSQL databases offer flexibility, horizontal scaling, and specialized data models. Many successful systems use both: SQL for transactional data and NoSQL for caching, sessions, and analytics.

The key insight: start with SQL until you can't. PostgreSQL can handle millions of transactions per day. Only move to NoSQL when you need specific capabilities: MongoDB for flexible schemas, Cassandra for write-heavy workloads, Redis for sub-millisecond latency, or Neo4j for graph traversals.

Database Types & Performance

Different database types excel at different workloads. Performance varies dramatically based on use case, data structure, and access patterns.

PostgreSQLSQL
15K QPS
Strength: ACID, complex queries
Weakness: Horizontal scaling
MongoDBDocument
50K QPS
Strength: Flexible schema, JSON
Weakness: Memory usage
CassandraWide Column
200K QPS
Strength: Linear scaling, writes
Weakness: Query flexibility
RedisKey-Value
1M QPS
Strength: Ultra-fast, in-memory
Weakness: Memory cost
Neo4jGraph
10K QPS
Strength: Relationships, traversal
Weakness: Learning curve
SQL vs NoSQL Trade-offs
ACID Compliance
95%SQL
60%NoSQL
Horizontal Scaling
40%SQL
90%NoSQL
Complex Queries
90%SQL
30%NoSQL
Development Speed
70%SQL
85%NoSQL
Schema Flexibility
30%SQL
95%NoSQL
Decision Framework

Choose your database based on your specific requirements, not just popularity or personal preference.

Choose SQL When:

  • • Complex relationships between data
  • • ACID transactions are critical
  • • Rich querying and reporting needed
  • • Data consistency is paramount
  • • Team has SQL expertise
  • • Compliance requirements (SOX, GDPR)

Choose NoSQL When:

  • • Massive scale (millions of users)
  • • Rapid development iterations
  • • Flexible, evolving data schemas
  • • Geographic distribution needed
  • • Simple key-value or document queries
  • • Horizontal scaling requirements
Real-World Use Cases
E-commerce Orders
SQL (PostgreSQL)
ACID transactions for payments, complex reporting queries
Content Management
Document (MongoDB)
Flexible content structure, rapid development
IoT Time Series
Wide Column (Cassandra)
High write volume, time-based partitioning
Session Store
Key-Value (Redis)
Ultra-fast lookups, TTL support
Social Network
Graph (Neo4j)
Friend relationships, recommendation algorithms
Analytics Warehouse
Columnar (ClickHouse)
OLAP queries, compression, aggregations
Performance Characteristics
SQL Query Performance
Query optimizer, indexes, mature tooling
Predictable
NoSQL Read Performance
Optimized for specific access patterns
Very High
SQL Write Performance
ACID overhead, but consistent
Good
NoSQL Write Performance
Eventually consistent, distributed writes
Excellent

Performance Reality Check

A well-designed SQL database often outperforms a poorly designed NoSQL database. Focus on proper indexing, query optimization, and data modeling regardless of your choice.

Common Database Selection Mistakes

Premature NoSQL Adoption

Choosing NoSQL "because it scales" without understanding your actual scaling needs. Most applications never reach the scale where SQL becomes a bottleneck.

SQL Fear

Avoiding SQL because it seems "old" or "difficult." Modern SQL databases like PostgreSQL support JSON, horizontal scaling, and many NoSQL features.

One Size Fits All

Using the same database for all use cases. Large systems often use multiple database types (polyglot persistence) for different components.

Quick Decision Matrix

High Consistency Needs

→ PostgreSQL, MySQL
Financial systems, user accounts

Massive Scale

→ Cassandra, DynamoDB
IoT data, activity feeds

Rapid Development

→ MongoDB, Firebase
Prototypes, content management

📝 Test Your Knowledge

6 questions • Progress: 0/6