Message Queues
Throughput benchmarks and delivery guarantees
Message queues decouple services, absorb traffic spikes, and enable asynchronous processing. They transform synchronous bottlenecks into scalable, distributed workflows. The choice of queue system depends on your requirements: Redis for speed, RabbitMQ for reliability, Kafka for streaming, or cloud services like SQS for simplicity.
The critical decision is delivery guarantees vs performance. At-most-once delivery is fast but may lose messages. At-least-once requires acknowledgments and may duplicate. Exactly-once is complex and slower. Choose based on your data criticality: use at-most-once for metrics, at-least-once for notifications, and exactly-once only for financial transactions.
⚡ Quick Decision
Choose Redis Pub/Sub When:
- • Need ultra-low latency (<1ms)
- • Real-time notifications
- • Can tolerate message loss
Choose Kafka When:
- • Need high throughput (2M+ msg/sec)
- • Event streaming & replay
- • Analytics pipelines
Choose RocketMQ When:
- • Need transactional messaging
- • Scheduled/delayed delivery
- • Message filtering required
Choose RabbitMQ When:
- • Need complex routing
- • Task queue processing
- • Guaranteed delivery matters
💡 For implementation guides and code examples: See our technology deep dives: Kafka, RabbitMQ, RocketMQ, Amazon SQS
Throughput and latency vary dramatically by system design and guarantees. Numbers based on typical production deployments.
Typical Message Sizes
Queue Sizing Rules
Step 1: What's Your Primary Use Case?
Step 2: What Are Your Constraints?
Latency Critical (<5ms)
Throughput Critical (>100K/sec)
Simplicity Critical
💰 Cost per Million Messages
⚙️ Operational Complexity
⚠️ Hidden Costs to Consider
- • Monitoring and observability tooling
- • Multi-region replication bandwidth
- • Storage costs for message retention
- • Engineer time for cluster management