Deployment Strategies
Deployment Strategies
Comprehensive guide to deployment patterns and release strategies
Recreate Deployment
Stop all old instances and start new ones
Best Use Case:
Development environments or when downtime is acceptable
Advantages
- +Simple implementation
- +Complete environment refresh
- +No resource overhead
- +Easy to understand
Disadvantages
- -Service downtime
- -User impact during deployment
- -No gradual rollout
- -High risk of issues
Implementation Steps:
- 1Stop all running instances
- 2Deploy new version
- 3Start new instances
- 4Verify deployment
Requirements:
Common Examples:
Alternative Strategies:
Rolling Deployment
Gradually replace old instances with new ones
Best Use Case:
Production systems requiring zero downtime
Advantages
- +Zero downtime
- +Gradual rollout
- +Resource efficient
- +Built into most orchestrators
Disadvantages
- -Mixed version state
- -Slower deployment
- -Complex rollback
- -Potential compatibility issues
Implementation Steps:
- 1Update instances one by one
- 2Wait for health checks
- 3Continue to next instance
- 4Monitor throughout process
Requirements:
Common Examples:
Alternative Strategies:
Blue-Green Deployment
Maintain two identical environments and switch between them
Best Use Case:
Critical systems requiring instant rollback capability
Advantages
- +Instant rollback
- +Zero downtime
- +Full testing in production environment
- +Clean environment state
Disadvantages
- -Double resource cost
- -Database migration complexity
- -State synchronization challenges
- -Infrastructure overhead
Implementation Steps:
- 1Deploy to inactive environment (Green)
- 2Test thoroughly in Green
- 3Switch traffic to Green
- 4Keep Blue as backup
Requirements:
Common Examples:
Alternative Strategies:
Canary Deployment
Deploy to a small subset of users first, then gradually increase
Best Use Case:
High-traffic applications requiring risk mitigation
Advantages
- +Early issue detection
- +Minimal user impact
- +Data-driven decisions
- +Gradual risk exposure
Disadvantages
- -Complex implementation
- -Requires sophisticated monitoring
- -Longer deployment time
- -Traffic routing complexity
Implementation Steps:
- 1Deploy to small percentage of traffic
- 2Monitor key metrics
- 3Gradually increase traffic
- 4Full rollout or rollback based on metrics
Requirements:
Common Examples:
Alternative Strategies:
A/B Testing Deployment
Run two versions simultaneously to compare performance
Best Use Case:
Feature validation and performance comparison
Advantages
- +Data-driven decisions
- +User experience validation
- +Performance comparison
- +Risk mitigation
Disadvantages
- -Complex analytics requirements
- -Statistical significance needs
- -Longer evaluation period
- -Resource overhead
Implementation Steps:
- 1Deploy both versions
- 2Split traffic between versions
- 3Collect performance metrics
- 4Analyze results and choose winner
Requirements:
Common Examples:
Alternative Strategies:
Shadow Deployment
Deploy new version alongside old, mirror traffic without affecting users
Best Use Case:
Testing new versions with real traffic without user impact
Advantages
- +Zero user impact
- +Real traffic testing
- +Performance validation
- +Safe experimentation
Disadvantages
- -Double resource usage
- -Complex traffic mirroring
- -Data consistency challenges
- -Limited to read-only operations
Implementation Steps:
- 1Deploy shadow version
- 2Mirror production traffic
- 3Compare responses and performance
- 4Decide on full deployment
Requirements:
Common Examples:
Alternative Strategies:
Feature Flag Deployment
Deploy code with features hidden behind toggles
Best Use Case:
Continuous deployment with controlled feature releases
Advantages
- +Instant feature toggle
- +Gradual rollout control
- +A/B testing capability
- +Decoupled deployment and release
Disadvantages
- -Code complexity increase
- -Technical debt accumulation
- -Flag management overhead
- -Potential performance impact
Implementation Steps:
- 1Deploy code with flags disabled
- 2Gradually enable for user segments
- 3Monitor feature performance
- 4Full rollout or disable based on results
Requirements:
Common Examples:
Alternative Strategies:
Immutable Deployment
Replace entire infrastructure with new immutable images
Best Use Case:
Containerized applications requiring consistent environments
Advantages
- +Consistent environments
- +Easy rollback
- +No configuration drift
- +Simplified debugging
Disadvantages
- -Longer deployment time
- -Resource intensive
- -Image size considerations
- -Registry dependencies
Implementation Steps:
- 1Build new immutable image
- 2Push to container registry
- 3Deploy new containers
- 4Remove old containers
Requirements:
Common Examples:
Alternative Strategies:
Database Migration Deployment
Coordinate application and database schema changes
Best Use Case:
Applications requiring database schema changes
Advantages
- +Coordinated schema updates
- +Data integrity maintenance
- +Backward compatibility support
- +Structured migration process
Disadvantages
- -Complex coordination
- -Potential data loss risk
- -Longer rollback time
- -Requires careful planning
Implementation Steps:
- 1Create backward-compatible schema
- 2Deploy application supporting both schemas
- 3Migrate data to new schema
- 4Remove old schema support
Requirements:
Common Examples:
Alternative Strategies:
Deployment Strategy Matrix
Selection Guide: Choose deployment strategies based on your risk tolerance, system criticality, and operational maturity. Start with simpler strategies and evolve to more sophisticated approaches as your team and infrastructure mature.