Prompt Engineering Mastery

Master the art and science of crafting effective prompts. Learn patterns, frameworks, and techniques for consistent AI outputs.

30 min readBeginner
Not Started
Loading...

🎯 What is Prompt Engineering?

Prompt Engineering is the practice of designing and refining inputs to get optimal outputs from LLMs. It's the difference between mediocre AI responses and production-ready results.

The 80/20 Rule: 80% of LLM output quality comes from 20% effort in prompt design. Master these techniques to 10x your AI application quality.

🎨 Prompt Patterns

Zero-Shot

Direct instruction without examples

Use when: Simple, well-defined tasks

❌ Poor Prompt

Write about dogs

✅ Good Prompt

Write a 200-word informative paragraph about Golden Retrievers, focusing on their temperament and suitability as family pets

Template: [Task] + [Constraints] + [Format]

📚 Prompt Frameworks

CLEAR Framework

Context, Length, Examples, Audience, Response

C

Context

Provide background information

L

Length

Specify desired output length

E

Examples

Show what you want

A

Audience

Define who will read it

R

Response

Specify format and style

Example:

Context: I'm building a React app for task management Length: 100-150 words Examples: Like Todoist or Notion tasks Audience: Junior developers Response: Bullet points with code snippets

🚀 Advanced Techniques

🎯 Prompt Chaining

Break complex tasks into multiple prompts

Prompt 1: "Extract key points"
Prompt 2: "Organize by theme"
Prompt 3: "Write summary"

🔄 Self-Consistency

Generate multiple outputs and vote

Run prompt 3 times
Compare outputs
Use majority answer

🎭 Perspective Prompting

Get diverse viewpoints

"As a developer..."
"As a user..."
"As a security expert..."

🏗️ Scaffolding

Provide structure for complex outputs

"### Section 1: [Topic]"
"Key points: •"
"### Section 2: [Topic]"

🔧 Prompt Improver

❌ Common Mistakes

Being too vague

❌ Bad

Tell me about AI

✅ Good

Explain how transformer neural networks enable large language models, focusing on the attention mechanism

Impact: Unfocused, rambling responses

No success criteria

❌ Bad

Write good code

✅ Good

Write Python code that is PEP 8 compliant, includes type hints, has docstrings, and handles errors gracefully

Impact: Subjective, inconsistent quality

Overloading the prompt

❌ Bad

Write a blog post about AI and ML and deep learning and also explain transformers and GPT and BERT and...

✅ Good

Write a 500-word blog post explaining transformers to software engineers new to ML

Impact: Confused, incomplete responses

Assuming knowledge

❌ Bad

Fix the bug in the auth flow

✅ Good

Here's my authentication code: [code]. Users report login fails after password reset. Debug and fix:

Impact: Generic advice instead of specific solutions

✅ Best Practices

Do's

  • ✓ Be specific and detailed
  • ✓ Provide examples when possible
  • ✓ Specify output format
  • ✓ Set clear constraints
  • ✓ Test and iterate prompts
  • ✓ Version control prompts

Don'ts

  • ✗ Use ambiguous language
  • ✗ Assume context
  • ✗ Overload single prompts
  • ✗ Ignore token limits
  • ✗ Skip validation
  • ✗ Use one prompt for all cases

🎯 Key Takeaways

Specificity wins: Clear, detailed prompts get better results than clever ones

Use frameworks: CLEAR, RISE, or STAR provide consistent structure

Examples > Instructions: Show don't tell with few-shot prompting

Iterate and test: A/B test prompts like you would UI changes

Version control: Track prompt changes and performance

📝 Prompt Engineering Mastery Check

1 of 8Current: 0/8

Which prompt pattern is best for complex reasoning or mathematical problems?