Advanced RAG Patterns

Master sophisticated RAG architectures for production systems. Learn hierarchical RAG, fusion techniques, and optimization strategies.

40 min readโ€ขAdvanced
Not Started
Loading...

๐Ÿš€ Beyond Basic RAG

While basic RAG works for simple Q&A, production systems need sophisticated patterns to handle complex queries, large documents, and high accuracy requirements.

Production Reality: Basic RAG achieves ~70% accuracy. Advanced patterns reach 85-95% by solving context fragmentation, query ambiguity, and retrieval-generation misalignment.

๐Ÿ—๏ธ Advanced RAG Patterns

Hierarchical RAG

Multi-level document structure with parent-child relationships

High

Chunking

Document โ†’ Sections โ†’ Paragraphs โ†’ Sentences

Retrieval

Query at multiple levels, combine results

Fusion

Hierarchical result fusion with context preservation

โœ… Benefits

  • โ€ข Better context preservation
  • โ€ข Reduced hallucinations
  • โ€ข Improved accuracy

โš ๏ธ Challenges

  • โ€ข Complex indexing
  • โ€ข Higher latency
  • โ€ข Storage overhead

Best for: Large documents, legal contracts, technical manuals

Implementation Example

# Hierarchical RAG Implementation
class HierarchicalRAG:
    def __init__(self):
        self.doc_index = {}  # Document level
        self.section_index = {}  # Section level  
        self.chunk_index = {}  # Chunk level
        
    def index_document(self, doc):
        # Create hierarchical structure
        sections = self.extract_sections(doc)
        for section in sections:
            chunks = self.chunk_section(section)
            for chunk in chunks:
                self.store_with_hierarchy(doc, section, chunk)
                
    def retrieve(self, query, k=5):
        # Multi-level retrieval
        doc_results = self.search_documents(query)
        section_results = self.search_sections(query)
        chunk_results = self.search_chunks(query)
        
        # Fuse results with hierarchy context
        return self.hierarchical_fusion(
            doc_results, section_results, chunk_results
        )

โšก RAG Optimization Techniques

Semantic Chunking

Split based on semantic boundaries, not fixed sizes

Implementation: Use sentence transformers to identify topic shifts
Benefits: Preserves context, better retrieval accuracy
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
import numpy as np

def semantic_chunking(text, threshold=0.5):
    sentences = sent_tokenize(text)
    embeddings = model.encode(sentences)
    
    chunks = []
    current_chunk = [sentences[0]]
    
    for i in range(1, len(sentences)):
        similarity = cosine_similarity(
            embeddings[i-1:i], embeddings[i:i+1]
        )[0][0]
        
        if similarity < threshold:
            # Topic shift detected
            chunks.append(' '.join(current_chunk))
            current_chunk = [sentences[i]]
        else:
            current_chunk.append(sentences[i])
    
    chunks.append(' '.join(current_chunk))
    return chunks

Overlapping Windows

Create overlapping chunks to preserve boundary context

Implementation: Slide window with configurable overlap percentage
Benefits: Reduced context loss, better boundary handling
def overlapping_chunks(text, chunk_size=1000, overlap=200):
    chunks = []
    start = 0
    
    while start < len(text):
        end = start + chunk_size
        chunk = text[start:end]
        
        # Ensure we don't cut words
        if end < len(text):
            last_space = chunk.rfind(' ')
            if last_space > -1:
                chunk = chunk[:last_space]
                end = start + last_space
        
        chunks.append(chunk)
        start = end - overlap
        
    return chunks

Hierarchical Chunking

Multi-level chunks from document structure

Implementation: Extract headings, sections, paragraphs as separate levels
Benefits: Multiple retrieval granularities, better context
def hierarchical_chunks(document):
    hierarchy = {
        'document': document.title,
        'sections': [],
        'paragraphs': [],
        'sentences': []
    }
    
    for section in document.sections:
        hierarchy['sections'].append({
            'content': section.content,
            'parent': document.title
        })
        
        for para in section.paragraphs:
            hierarchy['paragraphs'].append({
                'content': para.content,
                'parent': section.title
            })
    
    return hierarchy

๐Ÿงช RAG Pattern Simulator

๐Ÿ“Š Performance Impact

Metrics Comparison

Retrieval Accuracy
72% โ†’ 89%
+17%
Answer Relevance
68% โ†’ 84%
+16%
Latency (p95)
2.1s โ†’ 1.4s
-33%
Context Utilization
45% โ†’ 71%
+26%

Implementation Priority

1. Start Here
Semantic chunking + overlapping windows
2. Add Fusion
RAG Fusion for complex queries
3. Scale Up
Hierarchical RAG for large documents
4. Enterprise
Adaptive RAG with self-correction

๐ŸŽฏ Key Takeaways

โœ“

Pattern Selection Matters: Choose RAG patterns based on document complexity, query types, and accuracy requirements

โœ“

Optimize Incrementally: Start with semantic chunking, add fusion, then scale to hierarchical approaches

โœ“

Measure Everything: Track retrieval accuracy, answer relevance, and latency to guide optimization

โœ“

Context is King: Advanced RAG patterns excel at preserving and utilizing document context

โœ“

Production Readiness: Adaptive RAG with self-correction is the gold standard for enterprise systems

๐Ÿ“ Advanced RAG Quiz

1 of 5Current: 0/5

What is the main advantage of Hierarchical RAG over basic RAG?