Skip to main contentSkip to user menuSkip to navigation
System Designer
Back to Fundamentals

Monolith to Microservices

22 min read•Intermediate
Not Started
Loading...

Learn proven strategies for evolving monolithic applications into microservices architectures. Understand the trade-offs, decomposition patterns, and real-world lessons from successful migrations.

When to Consider Microservices

Microservices aren't always the answer. Consider migration when your monolith creates specific pain points that microservices can solve, and when you have the organizational maturity to handle the complexity.

Important: Start with a Monolith

Almost every successful microservices company started with a monolith. Premature microservices often fail because boundaries are unclear, requirements change rapidly, and teams lack experience with distributed systems.

Good Reasons to Migrate

Team Scaling Issues
Teams blocking each other, coordination overhead
High Signal
Technology Constraints
Different parts need different tech stacks
High Signal
Independent Scaling
Different load patterns, performance needs
Medium Signal
Deployment Bottlenecks
Fear of deployment, long release cycles
Medium Signal

Bad Reasons to Migrate

"It's the modern way"
Technology choices should solve business problems
"Better performance"
Network calls and distributed complexity often hurt performance
"Easier to scale"
Horizontal scaling is possible with monoliths too

Migration Strategy: Incremental Evolution

Successful migrations happen gradually, not in a big-bang rewrite. Each stage reduces risk while moving toward your target architecture.

1

Modular Monolith

Low EffortLow Risk

Well-structured monolith with clear module boundaries

Benefits
  • • Clear separation of concerns
  • • Easier to understand
  • • Single deployment
Challenges
  • • Still coupled deployment
  • • Shared database
  • • Technology lock-in
2

Database per Service

Medium EffortMedium Risk

Split database while keeping single codebase

Benefits
  • • Data ownership
  • • Independent scaling
  • • Technology flexibility
Challenges
  • • Data consistency
  • • Cross-service queries
  • • Migration complexity
3

API Gateway Pattern

High EffortMedium Risk

Extract services behind unified gateway

Benefits
  • • Service discovery
  • • Rate limiting
  • • Authentication centralized
Challenges
  • • Single point of failure
  • • Added latency
  • • Gateway complexity
4

Full Microservices

Very High EffortHigh Risk

Independent services with own databases and deployment

Benefits
  • • Complete independence
  • • Technology diversity
  • • Team autonomy
Challenges
  • • Distributed system complexity
  • • Network latency
  • • Data consistency

Real-World Migration Stories

Learn from companies that successfully navigated the monolith-to-microservices journey. Each took a different approach based on their specific constraints and goals.

1

Netflix

Before
Single Java application with Oracle database
After
700+ microservices with multiple databases
Timeline
2008-2016 (8 years)
Key Drivers
Global scale, AWS migration, Team autonomy
Lessons Learned
Start with clear service boundaries
2

Amazon

Before
Monolithic e-commerce platform
After
Service-oriented architecture with thousands of services
Timeline
2001-2006 (5 years)
Key Drivers
Developer productivity, Team scaling, Innovation speed
Lessons Learned
Two-pizza teams
3

Uber

Before
Python/PHP monolith with PostgreSQL
After
2000+ microservices with polyglot architecture
Timeline
2013-2018 (5 years)
Key Drivers
Rapid growth, Global expansion, Real-time requirements
Lessons Learned
Domain-driven design

Monolith vs Microservices Trade-offs

Both architectures have their place. Understanding the trade-offs helps you make informed decisions about when and how to migrate.

Small Team (<10)
90%monolith
30%microservices
Medium Team (10-50)
70%monolith
60%microservices
Large Team (50+)
40%monolith
85%microservices

Monolith Advantages

Development Speed
Simple deployment, debugging, testing
High
Operational Simplicity
Single deployable, easier monitoring
High
Consistency
Shared code, single database, ACID
High
Performance
No network calls, shared memory
High

Microservices Advantages

Team Autonomy
Independent development, deployment
High
Technology Diversity
Best tool for each job
High
Fault Isolation
Failures don't cascade
High
Independent Scaling
Scale services differently
High

Migration Decision Framework

Stick with Monolith If:

  • ☐ Team size < 10 developers
  • ☐ Domain boundaries are unclear
  • ☐ Limited DevOps/infrastructure experience
  • ☐ Tight coupling between business logic
  • ☐ Performance is critical (low latency)

Consider Microservices If:

  • ☐ Multiple teams, coordination issues
  • ☐ Clear domain boundaries exist
  • ☐ Different scaling requirements
  • ☐ Technology diversity needed
  • ☐ Strong DevOps culture and tooling

🎯 Microservices Migration Success Stories and Failures

Learn from real-world experiences: both successful migrations and costly mistakes

Metrics
Active Users
100M+ monthly
Services
800+ microservices
Teams
90+ squads
Deployment Frequency
1000+ per day
Outcome

Successfully scaled both technology and organization. Squad model became industry standard for team autonomy.

Lessons Learned
  • Microservices enable organizational scaling as much as technical scaling
  • Autonomous teams require strong engineering culture and tooling investment
  • Domain boundaries should align with team responsibilities
  • Conway's Law: system design mirrors communication structure
No quiz questions available
Quiz ID "monolith-to-microservices" not found